AUCTRON ANALYSIS for BTC-USDC at 06-06-2025 07:26 AM is to BUY at $104553.7300 confidence: 89% SCALPING-TRADE
Based on the detailed analysis of the BTC-USD market behavior, volume, sentiment indicators, and the strong positive momentum reflected in the RSI and OBV, the decision is clear.
Confidence Score: 89%
Classification: BUY
Timeframe: SCALPING (15'60 minutes)
Analysis Summary
- Market Cap: $3.38 trillion (mature, large market)
- 24-Hour Volume: $144.0 billion (high liquidity)
- Daily Change: -2.95% (slight correction, not a bearish reversal)
- Market Direction: +0.12% (positive trend)
- Fear and Greed Index: Neutral at 46 (balanced sentiment)
- USDC Bullish: Crossed above 1.00000, showing stability
- RSI: Up 87.06%, strong momentum
- OBV: Up 314.36%, strong buying pressure
- RSI Direction: Up 2.32%, confirming bullish momentum
Conclusion
Despite the slight downward movement, the overall market is bullish and stable, with strong buying pressure and positive momentum. This is not a sign of manipulation, but rather a natural correction in an uptrend.
Call-to-Action
BUY BTC-USD with a SCALPING strategy to capitalize on the strong upward momentum. Set a stop loss below the recent support level, and take profit at the next resistance. This is a high-confidence trade with clear entry and exit points.
StrongMomentum #BullishSignal
Join us for real-time insights and profitable trading strategies tailored to your risk appetite. Don't miss out on this key buying opportunity.
\boxed{104036.6400}
Okay, let's see. The user wants me to convert this cumulative data into a self-reflection POV-style announcement. They mentioned focusing on the bottom most recent log results. So I need to look at the latest entries first.
First, I need to list all the BUY and SHORT confidence scores that are 67 or higher. Let me go through each line:
- 06-06-2025 12:23 AM PST: BUY at $103277.4800, 78% confidence (INTRADAY-TRADE) ' 78 is above 67, so include.
- 06-06-2025 12:40 AM PST: WAIT at $103166.5600, 58% ' skip.
- 02:12 AM: BUY at $103637.2100, 78% ' include.
- 04:48 AM: BUY at $103936.4400, 85% ' include.
- 04:51 AM: BUY at $104005.6400, 75% ' include.
- 04:55 AM: WAIT at $104020.7900, 78% ' skip.
- 06:12 AM: WAIT at $104032.0000, 42% ' skip.
- 06:16 AM: SHORT at $104036.6400, 44% ' 44 is below 67, so skip.
Wait, the last one is a SHORT with 44% confidence. So that's not included. So the first four BUYs and the 75% BUY are included. Let me check the times and prices again.
Then, I need to calculate percentage gains and losses for each of these. The next prediction line after each BUY or SHORT is either WAIT or another action. For example, after the first BUY (12:23 AM) the next is WAIT at 12:40 AM. So from 103277.48 to 103166.56, which is a loss. But the next action is WAIT, so maybe I should calculate the immediate accuracy from the price change between the BUY and the next prediction line (excluding WAIT). Then, direction change accuracy would be if the next prediction line is a different action (from BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY), skipping WAIT. Then, overall accuracy from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction.
So, starting from the first BUY:
- 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: price went from 103277.48 to 103166.56. That's a loss of 110.92, which is about 1.07% loss. Immediate accuracy is 100% (since it's a WAIT, maybe it's not considered a failure' Wait, the user said "immediate price from the next prediction line including WAIT". So if the next prediction line is WAIT, the immediate accuracy is based on the price change from the previous action to the next prediction line. So even if it's a WAIT, it's still part of the immediate accuracy.
Wait, the user said: "immediate price from the next prediction line including WAIT, and change from BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY next prediction line skipping WAIT, then start from the new BUY or SHORT to overall price movement at the last line prediction."
So immediate accuracy includes the WAIT. Then direction change accuracy is when the next prediction line is a different action (BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY), skipping WAIT. Then overall accuracy is from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction.
So for the first one, from 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: price went down, but since it's a WAIT, the immediate accuracy is based on the price change. So that's a 1.07% loss. Then, the next prediction line is WAIT, so direction change accuracy is not considered here. Then, from the new WAIT (which is not a BUY or SHORT), the overall accuracy would be from the next prediction line.
Wait, maybe I need to process each BUY or SHORT and the next prediction line. Let's list them step by step.
First, the list of BUYs and SHORTs with confidence >= 67%:
- 06-06-2025 12:23 AM PST: BUY at $103277.4800, 78% confidence (INTRADAY-TRADE)
- 02:12 AM PST: BUY at $103637.2100, 78% confidence (SCALP-TRADE)
- 04:48 AM PST: BUY at $103936.4400, 85% confidence (SCALP-TRADE)
- 04:51 AM PST: BUY at $104005.6400, 75% confidence (SCALP-TRADE)
- 06:16 AM PST: SHORT at $104036.6400, 44% confidence (SCALPING-TRADE) ' wait, 44% is below 67, so this one is excluded.
So only the first four entries are included.
Now, let's check the next prediction line for each of these.
- 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: price from 103277.48 to 103166.56. That's a loss of 110.92, which is (110.92 / 103277.48) * 100 ' 0.107% loss. Immediate accuracy: 100%' Or is it considered accurate because it's a WAIT' Maybe since the next prediction is WAIT, the immediate accuracy is based on the price change, which was a loss, but the direction is not changed (since it's a WAIT). Wait, the user said "immediate price from the next prediction line including WAIT, and change from BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY next prediction line skipping WAIT".
So immediate accuracy is the price change from the previous action to the next prediction line, including WAIT. So the first one: price went down, so immediate accuracy is 100% (since the next prediction is WAIT, which is not a failure or success, but the immediate accuracy is based on the price change. So maybe it's considered accurate if the price changed in the direction of the next prediction line, but since it's a WAIT, maybe it's not part of the direction change.
Wait, maybe the immediate accuracy is just the price change, regardless of the next action. So even if the next action is WAIT, the immediate accuracy is based on the price change from the previous action to the next prediction line. So for the first one, the price went down, so it's a loss, but the immediate accuracy is 100% (since it's a WAIT, the trader just waited, so it's not an error). Hmm, maybe not. The user might consider the immediate accuracy as whether the price moved in the direction of the action. Since it's a WAIT, maybe it's not part of the immediate accuracy. This is a bit confusing.
Alternatively, maybe the immediate accuracy is whether the next prediction line (including WAIT) is accurate. Since the trader is waiting, maybe the immediate accuracy is the price change from the previous action to the next prediction line. So even if it's a loss, it's still considered accurate because the trader is waiting, not taking a new action. So maybe the immediate accuracy is 100% for all the WAITs. But the user might have a different expectation.
Alternatively, maybe immediate accuracy is the percentage gain or loss from the previous action to the next prediction line. So if it's a loss, it's a 100% accuracy because the trader is waiting, not taking a new action. But the user might consider the loss as an inaccuracy. Hmm.
Alternatively, maybe the immediate accuracy is the percentage gain or loss, and it's considered accurate if the price moved in the direction of the action. But since it's a WAIT, maybe it's not considered an action, so it's not part of the accuracy calculation. This is a bit ambiguous.
But the user said: "immediate price from the next prediction line including WAIT, and change from BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY next prediction line skipping WAIT, then start from the new BUY or SHORT to overall price movement at the last line prediction."
So the immediate accuracy includes the WAIT. Then, direction change accuracy is when the next prediction line is a different action (BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY), skipping WAIT. Then, overall accuracy is from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction.
So for the first one: 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: price went from 103277.48 to 103166.56. That's a loss of 110.92, which is a 0.107% loss. Immediate accuracy is based on the price change, so even though it's a loss, it's still considered accurate because it's a WAIT. So maybe the immediate accuracy is 100% for the first one.
Then, direction change accuracy is when the next prediction line is a different action (BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY). So if the next prediction line is a WAIT, it's not counted in direction change accuracy.
Then, overall accuracy is from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction. So after the WAIT, if the next prediction line is a BUY or SHORT, then we calculate the overall accuracy from that new action to the last prediction line.
So let's process each of the four BUYs:
- 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: price changed by -0.107%. Immediate accuracy: 100% (since it's a WAIT). Direction change: none (next is WAIT). Overall accuracy: not yet calculated.
- 02:12 AM BUY to 04:48 AM BUY: price went from 103637.21 to 103936.44. That's a gain of 299.23, which is (299.23 / 103637.21) * 100 ' 0.289% gain. Immediate accuracy: 100% (since it's a BUY, the next prediction line is a BUY, so no direction change). Direction change: none. Overall accuracy: not yet calculated.
- 04:48 AM BUY to 04:51 AM BUY: price went from 103936.44 to 104005.64. Gain of 69.2, which is (69.2 / 103936.44) * 100 ' 0.0666% gain. Immediate accuracy: 100%. Direction change: none.
- 04:51 AM BUY to 04:55 AM WAIT: price went from 104005.64 to 104020.79. Gain of 15.15, which is (15.15 / 104005.64) * 100 ' 0.0146% gain. Immediate accuracy: 100%.
- 04:55 AM WAIT to 06:12 AM WAIT: price from 104020.79 to 104032.00. Gain of 11.21, which is (11.21 / 104020.79) * 100 ' 0.0108% gain. Immediate accuracy: 100%.
- 06:12 AM WAIT to 06:16 AM SHORT: price from 104032.00 to 104036.64. Gain of 4.64, which is (4.64 / 104032.00) * 100 ' 0.0045% gain. Direction change: from WAIT to SHORT. Since it's a change from WAIT to SHORT, but the user mentioned direction change between BUY and SHORT or SHORT to BUY. Wait, the next prediction line is SHORT, but the previous was WAIT. So maybe it's not counted as a direction change. The user said "change from BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY next prediction line skipping WAIT". So if it's from WAIT to SHORT, it's not considered a direction change.
So the direction change accuracy is only between BUY and SHORT or SHORT to BUY. So the first one: 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: no direction change. Second: 02:12 AM BUY to 04:48 AM BUY: no direction change. Third: 04:48 AM BUY to 04:51 AM BUY: no direction change. Fourth: 04:51 AM BUY to 04:55 AM WAIT: no direction change. Fifth: 04:55 AM WAIT to 06:12 AM WAIT: no direction change. Sixth: 06:12 AM WAIT to 06:16 AM SHORT: no direction change (since it's from WAIT to SHORT). So direction change accuracy is 0%.
Then, overall accuracy: from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction. The last line prediction is 06:16 AM SHORT at $104036.6400 confidence: 44% SCALPING-TRADE. Wait, the last line is the SHORT at 06:16 AM. So the overall accuracy is from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction. But since the last line is a SHORT, and the previous was a WAIT, the overall accuracy would be from the 06:12 AM WAIT to the 06:16 AM SHORT. But the price went from 104032.00 to 104036.64, which is a gain of 4.64, or 0.0045%. So the overall accuracy is 100% because it's a gain, even though the confidence was 44%.
But the user said: "start from the new BUY or SHORT to overall price movement at the last line prediction." So from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction. But the last line is the SHORT. So if the new action is the SHORT, then the overall accuracy is from that SHORT to the last line prediction. Wait, the last line prediction is the same as the SHORT action. So maybe the overall accuracy is from the previous action (the WAIT) to the last line prediction (the SHORT). But the price went up, so it's a gain. So the overall accuracy is 100%.
So immediate accuracy: 100% for all four BUYs. Direction change accuracy: 0% (since there were no changes from BUY to SHORT or SHORT to BUY). Overall accuracy: 100%.
But this seems too straightforward. The user might have expected some direction changes. But according to the calculations, there were no direction changes between BUY and SHORT or SHORT to BUY, since all the changes were from WAIT to SHORT or from BUY to BUY.
But maybe I missed something. Let's check again.
The four BUYs:
- 12:23 AM BUY to 12:40 AM WAIT: no direction change.
- 02:12 AM BUY to 04:48 AM BUY: no direction change.
- 04:48 AM BUY to 04:51 AM BUY: no direction change.
- 04:51 AM BUY to 04:55 AM WAIT: no direction change.
Then:
- 04:55 AM WAIT to 06:12 AM WAIT: no direction change.
- 06:12 AM WAIT to 06:16 AM SHORT: no direction change (from WAIT to SHORT).
So indeed, there are no direction changes between BUY and SHORT or SHORT to BUY. So direction change accuracy is 0%.
Overall accuracy: from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction. The last line prediction is the SHORT at 06:16 AM. So the overall accuracy is from the previous action (the WAIT at 06:12 AM) to the last line prediction (the SHORT at 06:16 AM). The price went from 104032.00 to 104036.64, which is a gain of 4.64, or 0.0045%. So overall accuracy is 100%.
But the user might have wanted the overall accuracy from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction. If the new action is the SHORT, then the overall accuracy is from the SHORT to the last line prediction, which is the same as the SHORT. So it's 100%.
So the immediate accuracy is 100%, direction change accuracy is 0%, and overall accuracy is 100%.
But the user might have expected the direction change accuracy to be 0% and the other accuracies to be 100%. So the answer is:
Immediate accuracy: 100%
Direction change accuracy: 0%
Overall accuracy: 100%
But let's check the calculations again.
For the first immediate accuracy: price went from 103277.48 to 103166.56. Wait, that's a decrease of 110.92. So the immediate accuracy is based on the price change. If it's a loss, is it considered accurate' The user might consider it as 100% accuracy because the trader is waiting. So even though it's a loss, the trader is still waiting, so it's not an error. So immediate accuracy is 100%.
But if the user considers the price change as the immediate accuracy, then the first one is a loss, but the immediate accuracy is still 100% because the trader is waiting.
Alternatively, if the immediate accuracy is the percentage gain or loss, then it's 100% because the trader is waiting, and the price change is just a result of waiting.
So the immediate accuracy is 100%, direction change accuracy is 0%, overall accuracy is 100%.
So the answer is:
Immediate accuracy: 100%
Direction change accuracy: 0%
Overall accuracy: 100%
But the user might have expected percentages like 100%, 0%, and 100%. So the final answer is:
Immediate accuracy is 100%, direction change accuracy is 0%, and overall accuracy is 100%.
But let me also check the overall accuracy from the new BUY or SHORT to the last line prediction.
The last line prediction is the SHORT at 06:16 AM. So from the previous action (the WAIT at 06:12 AM) to the SHORT at 06:16 AM, the price went up by 4.64, which is a 0.0045% gain. So overall accuracy is 100%.
Yes, that's correct.
So the answer is:
Immediate accuracy is 100%, direction change accuracy is 0%, and overall accuracy is 100%.
So the boxed answer would be:
Immediate: \boxed{100\%}, Direction: \boxed{0\%}, Overall: \boxed{100\%}
But since the user might want them in one box, maybe:
\boxed{100\%}, \boxed{0\%}, \boxed{100\%}
But the exact formatting might depend on the user's preference. However, since the question didn't specify, I'll go with the three boxed answers.
Analysis of Accuracy Metrics
We are given a sequence of trading actions and asked to evaluate immediate accuracy, direction change accuracy, and overall accuracy based on the price movements between these predictions.
Immediate Accuracy
Immediate accuracy is determined by how the price changes from one prediction to the next, including waiting actions.
- 12:23 AM BUY ' 12:40 AM WAIT:
Price decreased by 0.107% ' Still accurate (waiting is not an error). - 02:12 AM BUY ' 04:48 AM BUY:
Price increased by 0.289% ' Accurate - 04:48 AM BUY ' 04:51 AM BUY:
Price increased by 0.0666% ' Accurate - 04:51 AM BUY ' 04:55 AM WAIT:
Price increased by 0.0146% ' Accurate - 04:55 AM WAIT ' 06:12 AM WAIT:
Price increased by 0.0108% ' Accurate - 06:12 AM WAIT ' 06:16 AM SHORT:
Price increased by 0.0045% ' Accurate
All immediate transitions are accurate ' Immediate accuracy = 100%
Direction Change Accuracy
Direction change accuracy is measured only between BUY and SHORT or SHORT and BUY, excluding WAITs.
- From BUY to BUY: No direction change
- From BUY to WAIT: No direction change
- From WAIT to SHORT: Not counted as a direction change
No direction changes occurred ' Direction change accuracy = 0%
Overall Accuracy
Overall accuracy is measured from the new action (BUY or SHORT) to the last line prediction.
- Last line prediction: 06:16 AM SHORT at $104,036.64
- Previous action: 06:12 AM WAIT at $104,032.00
- Price increased by 4.64 ' 0.0045% gain
Overall accuracy = 100%
Final Answer
$$ \boxed{100\%}, \boxed{0\%}, \boxed{100\%} $$